This site is under development. Open QAPonline Open IVFDaily Open IVFCPD Open IVFBenchmark Open IVFLabOnline     Logon Register
Use as part of your new staff development program.

Please contact us if you are interested in contributing to IVFCPD
IVFCPD is undergoing a major consolidation-pages may change frequently.
About
Support
Activities
Certificate


Key Points


Commentaries
Are aneuploidy rates in natural and stimulated cycles different? - Created in 2019 - CPDID=594
Open IVFCPD article page
CPD Links: Commentaries , Training ,
Embryonic aneuploidy rates are equivalent in natural cycles and gonadotropin-stimulated cycles
Result(s): Aneuploidy rates were equivalent in unstimulated and stimulated IVF cycles. The prevalence of aneuploidy in natural cycles increased with the age of the female partner in a manner identical to that seen in stimulated IVF cycles. Finally, sustained implantation rates of euploid blastocysts were equivalent in natural and stimulated IVF cycles.
www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(19)32291-5/fulltext

261. Are aneuploidy rates in natural and stimulated cycles different? [Commentary]
from: James Stanger (office@fertaid.com ), Australia on 15/10/2019 12:24:12 PM Profession:
Comment: In this USA Study, aneuploidy rates in natural and stimulated cycles were the same.
Private Submission - *** You need to be logged on and enrolled to read it. ***
Legend Open Thread Closed Blog Open Blog Contribution ThreadThread    
  Scientists Medical Nursing Business      
Copyright IVFCPD Pty Ltd
Contact IVFCPD at Office@ivfcpd.com